It’s been a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad weekend for WikiLeaks. On Friday, the national intelligence community confirmed that WikiLeaks worked hand in glove with Russia in its effort to throw the presidential election. It confirmed what most of us already knew–WikiLeaks is a Kremlin front.
Just hours before that announcement, Julian Assange and friends made an announcement that should send a chill down the spine of anyone who has any regard for privacy. They’re seriously considering building a database of people with verified accounts on Twitter. For those who don’t know, celebrities, world leaders, politicians and other important public figures with Twitter accoutns have blue checkmarks beside their names confirming that this is actually their account.
WikiLeaks’ database would include information about users’ families and finances. The original tweet has been deleted, but Scott McGrew, the tech reporter for KNTV in the Bay Area, got a screenshot.
If you're verified on Twitter, Wikileaks is considering figuring out where you live and the names of your children. Really. pic.twitter.com/xkvFcKxU1j
— Scott McGrew (@ScottMcGrew) January 6, 2017
So what does WikiLeaks want to do with this information?
We are looking for clear discrete (father/shareholding/party membership) variables that can be put into our AI software. Other suggestions?
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
That wasn’t nearly enough to calm down a firestorm of criticism from users well aware of WikiLeaks’ history of playing fast and loose with privacy. WikiLeaks’ information dumps frequently contain unredacted Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, and passport numbers–thus exposing dozens of innocent people to identity theft and harassment.
This practice has cost WikiLeaks a lot of goodwill from people who initially supported Assange’s efforts, including yours truly; I turned against WikiLeaks in 2013 when it emerged that he was not above leaking Social Security numbers.
WikiLeaks told Kevin Collier of Vocativ that all it’s doing is mapping relationships.
.@kevincollier No it is to develop a metric to understand influence networks based on proximity graphs.
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
As Assange and friends see it, this is no different from what a number of social media outlets already do.
For those outraged by our suggestion, here's an example of what @wikipedia already does: https://t.co/ygBwUA2Skp
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
And here's an example of what @LinkedIn does. Google? Facebook? Same. pic.twitter.com/c0L7HyZW4H
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
Few people were buying it, though–which is not surprising, given WikiLeaks’ past history.
https://twitter.com/EthanDLawrence/status/817436488417837056
ok, you can start by providing the exact address, salaries, net worths, and all family members of the person(s) controlling this account https://t.co/Lr82qDffvA
— The real Jon Brodkin (@jbrodkin) January 6, 2017
This is a good plan. If you're Darth Vader. https://t.co/cTi48kPr4d
— Matthew Green (@matthew_d_green) January 6, 2017
'Wikileaks Taskforce' completes transformation from pile-on troll army to genuinely sinister 'we know where you live' list-maker. https://t.co/jrkdEOL6a3
— Tim Maughan (@timmaughan) January 6, 2017
https://twitter.com/SamPrell/status/817460015493771265
Bringing my family into this makes it kinda personal. Just sayin'… https://t.co/kzWPQRMeDv
— Morgan Marquis-Boire (@headhntr) January 6, 2017
You don't need to know about my family to track my influence. No one is dumb enough to buy that BS. This is about intimidation. FULL STOP.
— Kathleen Smith (@KikkiPlanet) January 6, 2017
Even WikiLeaks’ fellow subversives at Anonymous were up in arms, and went as far as to tag Twitter co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey and the Twitter support team.
This is a sickening display of intimidation tactics. @jack @support @Twitter https://t.co/EsIaTbmyL4
— Anonymous (@YourAnonNews) January 6, 2017
WikiLeaks has blamed the criticism on an attempt by its critics to mislead the public.
Dishonest press reporting our speculative idea for database of account influencing *relationships* with WikiLeaks doxing home addresses.
— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 6, 2017
If Assange thought this would put out the fire, he was dead wrong.
Ya think maybe your ominous announcement, vague clarifications, and suspect motivations might be behind that reporting?
— frankly, man (@fmlehman) January 6, 2017
Oh & also your defensive & rather uncivil rejoinders against the many posts expressing confusion/concern abt said announcement?
— frankly, man (@fmlehman) January 6, 2017
Look, I saw the tweets and I'm a huge fan and supporter. You need to walk this idea back
— CursedObject ? (@CursedObject) January 6, 2017
It's not just the press, you've shaken your biggest supporters. My whole twittersphere who love you
— CursedObject ? (@CursedObject) January 6, 2017
But why are we supposed to trust your stated motives any more than we would trust anyone else's? You guys are just as scary!
— Gold & Youth (@GoldandYouth) January 6, 2017
While this was going on, Twitter gave WikiLeaks a quiet, but firm reminder that its proposal could potentially violate Twitter’s terms of service.
Posting another person’s private and confidential information is a violation of the Twitter Rules: https://t.co/NGx5hh2tTQ
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) January 6, 2017
Considering that Twitter has gone as far as to threaten to shut down Donald Trump’s Twitter account if he steps out of line, Assange better be very afraid.
(featured image courtesy Ecuadorian Embassy in the UK, available under a Creative Commons BY-SA license)