I haven’t thought too highly of WikiLeaks since learning that it found it acceptable to release unredacted Social Security numbers. Well, Julian Assange and friends have yet another strike against them. Seems that Assange wasn’t too keen on journalists probing the apparent links between WikiLeaks and the Kremlin.
On Saturday night, MSNBC weekend morning host Joy-Ann Reid tweeted that she planned to take a long, hard look at the ties between Assange, Moscow, and Donald Trump.
Tomorrow on #AMJoy we'll explore the unprecedented affinity between an American presidential candidate – Trump – Russia and Wilileaks.
— Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) July 24, 2016
Two hours later, WikiLeaks fired off a chilling reply to Reid.
You are pushing a discredited conspiracy theory. There is no affinity, whatsoever. Our lawyers will monitor your program.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 24, 2016
When Reid saw this on her phone the following afternoon, she responded with gravitas.
Noted. cc @NBCNews @MSNBC https://t.co/8Y1K9XuTPe
— Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) July 24, 2016
She linked to this stunned tweet from BBC News State Department correspondent Kim Ghattas.
Wow. Wiki leaks is now into intimidating journalists @JoyAnnReid https://t.co/KIYYDmBSnY
— Kim Ghattas (@BBCKimGhattas) July 24, 2016
This came before overwhelming technical evidence emerged that the leaked emails came from previous hacks by Russian hackers with close ties to the Kremlin. So on Monday night, she decided to troll WikiLeaks.
Ahem… #DNCleak https://t.co/2Ylzt07PSj
— Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) July 26, 2016
WikiLeaks is trying to claim that it didn’t get the emails from the Kremlin.
This has nothing to do with the emails we published in #DNCLeak. They are referring to different documents entirely.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 26, 2016
Really, Julian? Care to tell us where they came from, rather than bully journalists who are trying to find out where they came from?
And if you do follow through on your apparent legal threat to Reid, you’re going to have to explain–under oath–why you found it acceptable to release those emails without bothering to redact the personally identifiable information they contained. Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, addresses, phone numbers, passport numbers, the lot.
So WikiLeaks has the guts to threaten journalists, but it doesn’t have the guts to apologize to the innocent people whose identities were endangered by this leak? Yeah, you’re a real man, Julian. You’re no different from Charles C. Johnson, a guy who thinks trying to doxx a woman who claimed to have been gang-raped and asking for help in “taking out” an activist are acts of legitimate journalism.
I’m a subversive by inclination. After all, I once infiltrated a borderline cultish hypercharismatic campus ministry during my days as a student at the University of North Carolina to get hard evidence of how they were deceiving people. I believe in shining the hot lights on injustice as much as anyone. But endangering someone’s privacy for the sake of transparency is wrong. And intimidating journalists who are trying to get to the bottom of your motivations is equally wrong.
So for that reason, I share with Liberal America my response to WikiLeaks on Monday night.
Delete your account. And your site. Anyone who leaks SSNs has no right to lecture anyone. https://t.co/3AFuIXq7tJ
— Darrell Lucus (@DarrellLucus) July 25, 2016